Rolex Mens Yellow Gold Submariner With Blue Dial. Features A Yellow Gold Oyster Bracelet And Blue Rotating Bezel. Model Number: 16618
I find myself missing our elderly arguments about things like whether a watch winder is necessary or whether MSRP conveys significant knowledge. I am not definite why I miss them since as I recall I lost both of those, but I do.
So I'd like to open a thread for foolish horological arguments by the elderly f@rts. It is, of work, also open to all the young f@rts & new f@rts out there, as long as you are elderly at heart.
one. Is Swatch Group acting ethically in restricting wholesale distribution of its ETA movements? Is it acting wisely?
Some potential topics:
two. They have been shown that the Chinese can make high quality movements. Per Tony's post on the "Experts" thread, would it be unwise to depend on them to do so? In other words, is it unwise to make use of Sea-Gull as your source of movement supply? How much QC would you need to do? Is anyone familiar with Sea-Gull's business ethics?
three. To Rolex, or not to Rolex? Pros & cons of that most controversial of watch brands. (Well, possibly second most controversial.)
four. If that is not dead which can eternal lie & with unusual eons even death may die, does Cthulhu wear a watch & if so, what brand?
five. Is it believable, as Hitth suggests in the Invicta community, that the criticism of Invicta is a conspiracy by the Japanese to run them out of the market? I don't think this query is any sillier than the immediately before it.
Nota bene: For those who were not privileged to witness the debates among the elderly farts, they were vigorous but were always characterized by personal respect for the other forum participants, even while the differences of opinion could be forceful. I would hope we'll maintain the same standard.
No comments:
Post a Comment